WHIRLPOOL OF INDIA

w

We had conducted live test of this Lighting controller for use of 250W HPS Lamp verses 250 W HPS Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Philips. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 60.85% energy during 12 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 39.25%. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy with constant Lux level and is energy efficient.

Mr. Pravin Pinto
Sr Manager – Maintenance

MINDA VALEO

v

We had conducted live test of this Lighting controller for use of 250W MH Lamp verses 250 W MH Lamp with magnetic Ballast of WIPRO. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 56.53% energy during 12 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 43.47%. The product is superior compared to magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy and is energy efficient.

Mr. Bhagwan Bhirud
Group Leader – Maintenance

VICTOR GASKETS INDIA

vi
We had conducted live test of this Lighting controller for use of 250W MH (Metal Halide) Lamp verses 250 W MH (Metal Halide) Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Philips. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 55.09% energy during 25.16 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 44.21%. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy with constant Lux level and is energy efficient.

Mr. Dhananjay Joshi
Manager – Maintenance

TATA STEELS

t
We had conducted live test of this Lighting controller for use of 400 W HPS Lamp verses 400 W HPS Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Crompton Greaves. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 58.19% energy during 11 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 41.814%. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy with constant Lux level and is energy efficient.

Mr. Somyajyoti Chakroborty
Dy. Manager – Maintenance

SHREEDURGA SYNTEX

s
We had conducted live test of this Lighting controller for use of 250 W HPS Lamp verses 250 W HPS Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Asian. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 63.70% energy during 21 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 37.30%. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy with constant Lux level and is energy efficient.

For Shreedurga Syntex Pvt. Ltd.

PUNE MUNCIPAL CORPORATION

p
We had conducted a Live demonstration a sample test survey of this Lighting Controller (Electronic Ballasts) for use of 250 W & 150 W HPSV Lamps for our Sambhaji park feeder on Jungli Maharaj road. As per primary observations from daily readings of MSEB meters installed in feeder, indicates the energy consumed by this controller is approximately 20 – 25 % less of KWh consumed as compared to conventional magnetic Ballasts of HPSV fittings. The performance is thus Satisfactory.

Executive Engineer (Technical)
Pune Municipal Corporation

MAHINDRA FORGINGS

m
We had conducted live test of this Lighting controller for use of 400 W MH Lamp verses 400 W MH Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Crompton Greaves. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 64.56% energy during 24 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 35.44%. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy with constant Lux level and is energy efficient.

Mr. Rajput
Manager – Maintenance

KURKUMBH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.

We had conducted live test of this Lighting controller for use of 250 W MH Lamp verses 250 W MH Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Alpha Lite. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 52.625% energy during 12 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 47.38%. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy with constant Lux level and is energy efficient.

Mr. Narsing Thorat
CETP In charge

KORES

k
We had conducted live test of this Lighting controller for use of 250 W MH Lamp verses 250 W MH Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Venture. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 70.03% energy during 24 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 29.97%. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy and is energy efficient.

Mr. Dharmattikar
Head Maintenance

SUBROS

su
We had conducted live test demonstration – sample test of this Lighting controller for use of 250 W MH Lamp verses 250 W MH Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Wipro. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 59.44% energy during 12 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 40.56%. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy with constant Lux level and is energy efficient.

Mr. Bhagwan Salunkhe
Head Maintenance

TACO

We had conducted live test demonstration – sample test of this Lighting controller for use of 400 W Metal Halide Lamp verses 400 W Metal Halide Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Wipro. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 36.608 % energy during 12 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 63.392%. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy with constant Lux level and is energy efficient.

Mr. Vijay Patil
Manager Maintenance

NUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA

n
We had conducted live test demonstration – sample test of this Lighting controller for use of 250 W Metal Halide Lamp verses 250 W Metal Halide Lamp with magnetic Ballast of Asian. The test clearly indicated this controllers consumed 49.22 % energy during 12 Hours cycle without any difference in light output. The actual energy saved was 50.78%. The product saved 1.98 KWh in 12 hours. The product is superior compared to existing magnetic ballasts and definitely saves energy with constant Lux level and is energy efficient.

Mr. K N Damor
Chief Engineer

Thermax

“Superior Product”

Mr. AnandDeshman
Thermax

SANDWIK

“Superior Lighting Levels along with energy savings.”

Mr. Arvind Choudhary
SANDWIK.

Whirlpool

“Superior than existing products and is energy efficient.”

Mr. Pravin Pinto
Whirlpool.

TATA Steels

“Huge cost and maintenance savings apart from Direct Electricity savings”

Mr. Somyajyoti Chakraborty
TATA Steels.

Indian Oil Corporation

“Actual Energy Saved 71.45%.”

Mr. Naresh Shah
Indian Oil Corporation

NPCIL

“Product Saved 1.98 KWh in 12 hours.”

Mr. K. N. Damor
NPCIL.

LAVASA Corporation

“We Never had a single incidence of maintenance till date.”

LAVASA Corporation.

Pune Municipal Corporation

“Product saved energy and consumed less KWh than conventional product.”

Pune Municipal Corporation